On 3.12.18 г. 17:50 ч., Sasha Levin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 02:36:05PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >> >> >> On 29.11.18 г. 14:21 ч., Greg KH wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:11:21AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >>>> From: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> We want to release the unused reservation we have since it refills the >>>> delayed refs reserve, which will make everything go smoother when >>>> running the delayed refs if we're short on our reservation. >>>> >>>> CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.4+ >>>> Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxx> >>>> Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> Hello Greg, >>>> >>>> Here is a fixed up backport for upstream commit >>>> f45c752b65af46bf42963295c332865d95f97fff >>>> This one applies cleanly to 4.4.y and 4.9.y >>> >>> What about 4.14.y? I don't want to apply this to only 4.4 and 4.9 and >>> not 4.14. Can you provide a working backport there too? >> >> I've only made backports as a result of your "failed to apply" emails. >> If there isn't a backport for 4.14 then this means it's either handled >> or you didn't send such an email, or i wasn't cced >> >>> >>> And I don't see the 2/3 patch in this series, has that already been >>> handled? > > I see commit 2/3 failed to apply on 4.9 and 4.4: > https://www.spinics.net/lists/stable/msg267061.html would you send a > backport for it as well? I think not, because the memalloc_xxx_save/restore infrastructure is missing and actually plumbing GFP flags to btrfs_iget so that in only 1 unique context we can pass GFP_NOFS will be rather invasive. > > -- > Thanks, > Sasha >
