4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit 3401d42c7ea2d064d15c66698ff8eb96553179ce ]
Previous commit /adding/ support for 160 MHz chanspecs was incomplete.
It didn't set bandwidth info and didn't extract control channel info. As
the result it was also using uninitialized "sb" var.
This change has been tested for two chanspecs found to be reported by
some devices/firmwares:
1) 60/160 (0xee32)
Before: chnum:50 control_ch_num:36
After: chnum:50 control_ch_num:60
2) 120/160 (0xed72)
Before: chnum:114 control_ch_num:100
After: chnum:114 control_ch_num:120
Fixes: 330994e8e8ec ("brcmfmac: fix for proper support of 160MHz bandwidth")
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmutil/d11.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmutil/d11.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmutil/d11.c
index e7584b842dce..eb5db94f5745 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmutil/d11.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmutil/d11.c
@@ -193,6 +193,9 @@ static void brcmu_d11ac_decchspec(struct brcmu_chan *ch)
}
break;
case BRCMU_CHSPEC_D11AC_BW_160:
+ ch->bw = BRCMU_CHAN_BW_160;
+ ch->sb = brcmu_maskget16(ch->chspec, BRCMU_CHSPEC_D11AC_SB_MASK,
+ BRCMU_CHSPEC_D11AC_SB_SHIFT);
switch (ch->sb) {
case BRCMU_CHAN_SB_LLL:
ch->control_ch_num -= CH_70MHZ_APART;
--
2.19.1
