4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
commit f8397d69daef06d358430d3054662fb597e37c00 upstream.
When a metadata read is served the endio routine btree_readpage_end_io_hook
is called which eventually runs the tree-checker. If tree-checker fails
to validate the read eb then it sets EXTENT_BUFFER_CORRUPT flag. This
leads to btree_read_extent_buffer_pages wrongly assuming that all
available copies of this extent buffer are wrong and failing prematurely.
Fix this modify btree_read_extent_buffer_pages to read all copies of
the data.
This failure was exhibitted in xfstests btrfs/124 which would
spuriously fail its balance operations. The reason was that when balance
was run following re-introduction of the missing raid1 disk
__btrfs_map_block would map the read request to stripe 0, which
corresponded to devid 2 (the disk which is being removed in the test):
item 2 key (FIRST_CHUNK_TREE CHUNK_ITEM 3553624064) itemoff 15975 itemsize 112
length 1073741824 owner 2 stripe_len 65536 type DATA|RAID1
io_align 65536 io_width 65536 sector_size 4096
num_stripes 2 sub_stripes 1
stripe 0 devid 2 offset 2156920832
dev_uuid 8466c350-ed0c-4c3b-b17d-6379b445d5c8
stripe 1 devid 1 offset 3553624064
dev_uuid 1265d8db-5596-477e-af03-df08eb38d2ca
This caused read requests for a checksum item that to be routed to the
stale disk which triggered the aforementioned logic involving
EXTENT_BUFFER_CORRUPT flag. This then triggered cascading failures of
the balance operation.
Fixes: a826d6dcb32d ("Btrfs: check items for correctness as we search")
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.4+
Suggested-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 10 +---------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -452,9 +452,9 @@ static int btree_read_extent_buffer_page
int mirror_num = 0;
int failed_mirror = 0;
- clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_CORRUPT, &eb->bflags);
io_tree = &BTRFS_I(root->fs_info->btree_inode)->io_tree;
while (1) {
+ clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_CORRUPT, &eb->bflags);
ret = read_extent_buffer_pages(io_tree, eb, WAIT_COMPLETE,
btree_get_extent, mirror_num);
if (!ret) {
@@ -465,14 +465,6 @@ static int btree_read_extent_buffer_page
ret = -EIO;
}
- /*
- * This buffer's crc is fine, but its contents are corrupted, so
- * there is no reason to read the other copies, they won't be
- * any less wrong.
- */
- if (test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_CORRUPT, &eb->bflags))
- break;
-
num_copies = btrfs_num_copies(root->fs_info,
eb->start, eb->len);
if (num_copies == 1)
