On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 07:09:46PM -0200, Rafael David Tinoco wrote: > On 12/4/18 8:48 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.7 release. > > There are 139 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu Dec 6 10:36:22 UTC 2018. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.19.7-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > During functional tests for this v4.19 release, we faced a PANIC, > described bellow, but unlikely related to this specific v4.19 version. > > First a WARN() at tcp_output.c: > > tcp_send_loss_probe(): > ... > /* Retransmit last segment. */ > if (WARN_ON(!skb)) > goto rearm_timer; > ... > > [ 173.557528] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 0 at > /srv/oe/build/tmp-rpb-glibc/work-shared/juno/kernel-source/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:2485 > tcp_send_loss_probe+0x164/0x1e8 > [ 173.571425] Modules linked in: crc32_ce crct10dif_ce fuse > [ 173.576804] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 4.19.7-rc1 #1 > [ 173.583014] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r2) (DT) So only this one machine saw this failure? If you can reproduce it again, bisection would be great to do if possible. thanks, greg k-h
