On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 11:14:59PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Cherry picking only one of the 50-odd patches we've committed into > late 4.19 and 4.20 kernels to fix the problems we've found really > seems like asking for trouble. If you're going to back port random > data corruption fixes, then you need to spend a *lot* of time > validating that it doesn't make things worse than they already > are... Any reason why we can't take the 50-odd patches in their entirety? It sounds like 4.19 isn't fully fixed, but 4.20-rc1 is? If so, what do you recommend we do to make 4.19 working properly? thanks, greg k-h
