Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> [ Upstream commit 3401d42c7ea2d064d15c66698ff8eb96553179ce ]
>
> Previous commit /adding/ support for 160 MHz chanspecs was incomplete.
> It didn't set bandwidth info and didn't extract control channel info. As
> the result it was also using uninitialized "sb" var.
>
> This change has been tested for two chanspecs found to be reported by
> some devices/firmwares:
> 1) 60/160 (0xee32)
> Before: chnum:50 control_ch_num:36
> After: chnum:50 control_ch_num:60
> 2) 120/160 (0xed72)
> Before: chnum:114 control_ch_num:100
> After: chnum:114 control_ch_num:120
>
> Fixes: 330994e8e8ec ("brcmfmac: fix for proper support of 160MHz bandwidth")
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Please mark your stable patches with:
X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore
This way patchwork ignores them and this saves my time. Thank you.
--
Kalle Valo
