4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit 4ac15ea53622272c01954461b4814892b7481b40 ]
Fix afs_deliver_to_call() to handle -EIO being returned by the operation
delivery function, indicating that the call found itself in the wrong
state, by printing an error and aborting the call.
Currently, an assertion failure will occur. This can happen, say, if the
delivery function falls off the end without calling afs_extract_data() with
the want_more parameter set to false to collect the end of the Rx phase of
a call.
The assertion failure looks like:
AFS: Assertion failed
4 == 7 is false
0x4 == 0x7 is false
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/afs/rxrpc.c:462!
and is matched in the trace buffer by a line like:
kworker/7:3-3226 [007] ...1 85158.030203: afs_io_error: c=0003be0c r=-5 CM_REPLY
Fixes: 98bf40cd99fc ("afs: Protect call->state changes against signals")
Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/afs/rxrpc.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
index 77a83790a31f..2543f24d23f8 100644
--- a/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
+++ b/fs/afs/rxrpc.c
@@ -500,7 +500,6 @@ static void afs_deliver_to_call(struct afs_call *call)
case -EINPROGRESS:
case -EAGAIN:
goto out;
- case -EIO:
case -ECONNABORTED:
ASSERTCMP(state, ==, AFS_CALL_COMPLETE);
goto done;
@@ -509,6 +508,10 @@ static void afs_deliver_to_call(struct afs_call *call)
rxrpc_kernel_abort_call(call->net->socket, call->rxcall,
abort_code, ret, "KIV");
goto local_abort;
+ case -EIO:
+ pr_err("kAFS: Call %u in bad state %u\n",
+ call->debug_id, state);
+ /* Fall through */
case -ENODATA:
case -EBADMSG:
case -EMSGSIZE:
--
2.17.1
