[merged] ubsan-dont-mark-__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable-as-noreturn.patch removed from -mm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch titled
     Subject: lib/ubsan.c: don't mark __ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable as noreturn
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     ubsan-dont-mark-__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable-as-noreturn.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: lib/ubsan.c: don't mark __ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable as noreturn

gcc-8 complains about the prototype for this function:

lib/ubsan.c:432:1: error: ignoring attribute 'noreturn' in declaration of a built-in function '__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable' because it conflicts with attribute 'const' [-Werror=attributes]

This is actually a GCC's bug. In GCC internals
__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable() declared with both 'noreturn' and
'const' attributes instead of only 'noreturn':
   https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84210

Workaround this by removing the noreturn attribute.

[aryabinin: add information about GCC bug in changelog]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181107144516.4587-1-aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

 lib/ubsan.c |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/lib/ubsan.c~ubsan-dont-mark-__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable-as-noreturn
+++ a/lib/ubsan.c
@@ -427,8 +427,7 @@ void __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds(
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds);
 
 
-void __noreturn
-__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable(struct unreachable_data *data)
+void __ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable(struct unreachable_data *data)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from arnd@xxxxxxxx are

vfs-replace-current_kernel_time64-with-ktime-equivalent.patch




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux