Re: [PATCH 4.9 V2 09/24] ARM: spectre-v2: add firmware based hardening

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



All,

It is now almost two weeks since David posted the patches, and a week
since the last message in this thread.

What is happening with these patches?  What about the 4.4-stable
backport as well?  Does anyone care about these anymore?  Do we have
any product customers using 32-bit Cortex CPUs anymore?

David - FYI - everything in my Spectre branch is now in mainline as
of 4.20-rc3, and I have nothing further planned for core 32-bit ARM
Spectre workarounds.

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:08:48AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 11/13/18 6:23 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Russell,
> > 
> > On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:54:10 +0000,
> > Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Marc,
> >>
> >> Can you please ack this to say that you are now happy with it after
> >> your comments on version 1, so we can move forward and have Greg
> >> merge it.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 11:43:47AM -0500, David Long wrote:
> >>> From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> Commit 10115105cb3aa17b5da1cb726ae8dd5f6854bd93 upstream.
> >>> Commit 6282e916f774e37845c65d1eae9f8c649004f033 upstream.
> >>>
> >>> Add firmware based hardening for cores that require more complex
> >>> handling in firmware.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Boot-tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Sure. Feel free to add my
> > 
> > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> > 
> > I assume someone has tested these patches (I haven't, and I'm unlikely
> > to do so in the near future as I'm travelling). I'm not sure Tony's
> > "Boot-tested-by" is still valid, and Florian's earlier set of tests
> > didn't show the issues of the initial backport.
> 
> Correct, I was not testing any KVM path at all, which is why this did
> not show up as a problem for me, I am not really well equipped to
> perform KVM testing at the moment.
> -- 
> Florian

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux