On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:17:15AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:52 AM Nathan Chancellor > <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 10:31:35AM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > Greg, > > > I'm in the process of preparing backports for building 4.9 and 4.4 > > > kernels with Clang. Going off of mka's very helpful: > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/22/943, I've prepared the list of SHA's > > > that were marked UPSTREAM (internal convention used to denote patch > > > applies cleanly): > > > https://gist.github.com/nickdesaulniers/fe995f4b7c52af8de1a283c0a53562d9. > > > But it seems that some of these shas no longer apply cleanly. I was > > > thus curious: > > > > > > 1. May I send you a pull request with the patches properly backported? > > > I'm happy to do the work, just want a green light before backporting > > > all of these patches. > > > 2. Should I denote in any way if I had to modify any patch to get it > > > to apply cleanly? This helps in code review, IMO. If so, what > > > convention should I use? > > > > I usually add my initials with a small note for anything non-trivial > > like: https://github.com/nathanchance/continuous-integration/blob/sandbox/patches/4.4/arm64/0015-kbuild-fix-linker-feature-test-macros-when-cross-com.patch > > Got it, thanks! > > > > > I meant to post this on GitHub earlier but was wiped out from work. I > > did a successful backport for arm64 on top of 4.4.163 a couple of days > > ago that is based on the work Matthias did with some of the newer fixes > > that have cropped up. Hopefully it is of some use :) > > Great! Let's keep this series, and wait to hear back from GKH how he > wants the patches (your set looks like it's easily mailed if Greg does > not want a PR). I'll start working on one for 4.9 only then. Also, > it would be good to add patches for x86_64. > Yes, I will work on x86_64 now. > > > > https://github.com/nathanchance/continuous-integration/tree/sandbox/patches/4.4/arm64 > > https://travis-ci.com/nathanchance/continuous-integration/jobs/159318688 > > Just a side note: I think this is an awesome side effect of our CI > setup. "Here's a hyperlink to a log that shows that this builds AND > boots in qemu." > Very much so! Thanks, Nathan > -- > Thanks, > ~Nick Desaulniers
