4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> commit 991a25194097006ec1e0d2e0814ff920e59e3465 upstream. On architectures with CBAUDEX == 0 (Alpha and PowerPC), the code in tty_baudrate.c does not do any limit checking on the tty_baudrate[] array, and in fact a buffer overrun is possible on both architectures. Add a limit check to prevent that situation. This will be followed by a much bigger cleanup/simplification patch. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> Requested-by: Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxxx> Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@xxxxxxxx> Cc: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.c +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_baudrate.c @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ speed_t tty_termios_baud_rate(struct kte else cbaud += 15; } - return baud_table[cbaud]; + return cbaud >= n_baud_table ? 0 : baud_table[cbaud]; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(tty_termios_baud_rate); @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ speed_t tty_termios_input_baud_rate(stru else cbaud += 15; } - return baud_table[cbaud]; + return cbaud >= n_baud_table ? 0 : baud_table[cbaud]; #else return tty_termios_baud_rate(termios); #endif
