Re: STIBP by default.. Revert?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: STIBP by default.. Revert?
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 15:58:32 -0800
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@xxxxxxxxx>, Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <32d00fb2-7187-ed6f-ab1e-287151e82b3a@linux.intel.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)

> So my patchset and Jiri's patchset should probably be merged together, so the
> users have a choice of the behavior.

... or delay Jiri's patchkit until the scheduler can actually check
properly for the cases when it is really needed. 

-Andi

References:
- STIBP by default.. Revert?
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: STIBP by default.. Revert?
  - From: Jiri Kosina
- Re: STIBP by default.. Revert?
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: STIBP by default.. Revert?
  - From: Jiri Kosina
- Re: STIBP by default.. Revert?
  - From: Tim Chen

Prev by Date: Re: STIBP by default.. Revert?
Next by Date: Re: STIBP by default.. Revert?
Previous by thread: Re: STIBP by default.. Revert?
Next by thread: Re: STIBP by default.. Revert?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux