On 11/13/18 9:23 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
Russell,
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:54:10 +0000,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Marc,
Can you please ack this to say that you are now happy with it after
your comments on version 1, so we can move forward and have Greg
merge it.
Thanks.
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 11:43:47AM -0500, David Long wrote:
From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Commit 10115105cb3aa17b5da1cb726ae8dd5f6854bd93 upstream.
Commit 6282e916f774e37845c65d1eae9f8c649004f033 upstream.
Add firmware based hardening for cores that require more complex
handling in firmware.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Boot-tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sure. Feel free to add my
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
I assume someone has tested these patches (I haven't, and I'm unlikely
to do so in the near future as I'm travelling). I'm not sure Tony's
"Boot-tested-by" is still valid, and Florian's earlier set of tests
didn't show the issues of the initial backport.
Thanks,
M.
I tested the patch set through kernelci and (belatedly) kvm-unit-tests,
the latter of which revealed the problem in V1 #11/24. I have to assume
Florian didn't specifically test kvm, something I myself had originally
assumed would be covered by kernelci.
I didn't scrub any of the ack/tested/reviewed lines from the original
patches. I've always assumed this is the correct way to do this but
maybe it's not?
-dl
