4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>
commit fb5c39d7a887108087de6ff93d3f326b01b4ef41 upstream.
max_extent_size is supposed to be the largest contiguous range for the
space info, and ctl->free_space is the total free space in the block
group. We need to keep track of these separately and _only_ use the
max_free_space if we don't have a max_extent_size, as that means our
original request was too large to search any of the block groups for and
therefore wouldn't have a max_extent_size set.
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -7573,6 +7573,7 @@ static noinline int find_free_extent(str
struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group = NULL;
u64 search_start = 0;
u64 max_extent_size = 0;
+ u64 max_free_space = 0;
u64 empty_cluster = 0;
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
int loop = 0;
@@ -7867,8 +7868,8 @@ unclustered_alloc:
spin_lock(&ctl->tree_lock);
if (ctl->free_space <
num_bytes + empty_cluster + empty_size) {
- if (ctl->free_space > max_extent_size)
- max_extent_size = ctl->free_space;
+ max_free_space = max(max_free_space,
+ ctl->free_space);
spin_unlock(&ctl->tree_lock);
goto loop;
}
@@ -8037,6 +8038,8 @@ loop:
}
out:
if (ret == -ENOSPC) {
+ if (!max_extent_size)
+ max_extent_size = max_free_space;
spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
space_info->max_extent_size = max_extent_size;
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
