[PATCH 4.9 021/141] sched/fair: Fix the min_vruntime update logic in dequeue_entity()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Song Muchun <smuchun@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 9845c49cc9bbb317a0bc9e9cf78d8e09d54c9af0 ]

The comment and the code around the update_min_vruntime() call in
dequeue_entity() are not in agreement.

>From commit:

  b60205c7c558 ("sched/fair: Fix min_vruntime tracking")

I think that we want to update min_vruntime when a task is sleeping/migrating.
So, the check is inverted there - fix it.

Signed-off-by: Song Muchun <smuchun@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: b60205c7c558 ("sched/fair: Fix min_vruntime tracking")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181014112612.2614-1-smuchun@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3502,7 +3502,7 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, st
 	 * put back on, and if we advance min_vruntime, we'll be placed back
 	 * further than we started -- ie. we'll be penalized.
 	 */
-	if ((flags & (DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE)) == DEQUEUE_SAVE)
+	if ((flags & (DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE)) != DEQUEUE_SAVE)
 		update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
 }
 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux