3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ [ Upstream commit b9576fc3624eb9fc88bec0d0ae883fd78be86239 ] The xfstests test suite assumes that an attempt to collapse range on the range (0, 1) will return EOPNOTSUPP if the file system does not support collapse range. Commit 280227a75b56: "ext4: move check under lock scope to close a race" broke this, and this caused xfstests to fail when run when testing file systems that did not have the extents feature enabled. Reported-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/ext4/extents.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index 6dbfa92bf78a..1e51008e237f 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -5400,6 +5400,14 @@ int ext4_collapse_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len) loff_t new_size, ioffset; int ret; + /* + * We need to test this early because xfstests assumes that a + * collapse range of (0, 1) will return EOPNOTSUPP if the file + * system does not support collapse range. + */ + if (!ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + /* Collapse range works only on fs block size aligned offsets. */ if (offset & (EXT4_CLUSTER_SIZE(sb) - 1) || len & (EXT4_CLUSTER_SIZE(sb) - 1)) -- 2.17.1
