4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 713358369382cebf92f6e98ce2005f94e7344931 ]
When getting pr_assocstatus and pr_streamstatus by sctp_getsockopt,
it doesn't correctly process the case when policy is set with
SCTP_PR_SCTP_ALL | SCTP_PR_SCTP_MASK. It even causes a
slab-out-of-bounds in sctp_getsockopt_pr_streamstatus().
This patch fixes it by return -EINVAL for this case.
Fixes: 0ac1077e3a54 ("sctp: get pr_assoc and pr_stream all status with SCTP_PR_SCTP_ALL")
Reported-by: syzbot+5da0d0a72a9e7d791748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Suggested-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/sctp/socket.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -7101,14 +7101,15 @@ static int sctp_getsockopt_pr_assocstatu
}
policy = params.sprstat_policy;
- if (!policy || (policy & ~(SCTP_PR_SCTP_MASK | SCTP_PR_SCTP_ALL)))
+ if (!policy || (policy & ~(SCTP_PR_SCTP_MASK | SCTP_PR_SCTP_ALL)) ||
+ ((policy & SCTP_PR_SCTP_ALL) && (policy & SCTP_PR_SCTP_MASK)))
goto out;
asoc = sctp_id2assoc(sk, params.sprstat_assoc_id);
if (!asoc)
goto out;
- if (policy & SCTP_PR_SCTP_ALL) {
+ if (policy == SCTP_PR_SCTP_ALL) {
params.sprstat_abandoned_unsent = 0;
params.sprstat_abandoned_sent = 0;
for (policy = 0; policy <= SCTP_PR_INDEX(MAX); policy++) {
@@ -7160,7 +7161,8 @@ static int sctp_getsockopt_pr_streamstat
}
policy = params.sprstat_policy;
- if (!policy || (policy & ~(SCTP_PR_SCTP_MASK | SCTP_PR_SCTP_ALL)))
+ if (!policy || (policy & ~(SCTP_PR_SCTP_MASK | SCTP_PR_SCTP_ALL)) ||
+ ((policy & SCTP_PR_SCTP_ALL) && (policy & SCTP_PR_SCTP_MASK)))
goto out;
asoc = sctp_id2assoc(sk, params.sprstat_assoc_id);
