From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 6f7de19ed3d4d3526ca5eca428009f97cf969c2f ]
Commit ff3d27a048d9 ("btrfs: qgroup: Finish rescan when hit the last leaf
of extent tree") added a new exit for rescan finish.
However after finishing quota rescan, we set
fs_info->qgroup_rescan_progress to (u64)-1 before we exit through the
original exit path.
While we missed that assignment of (u64)-1 in the new exit path.
The end result is, the quota status item doesn't have the same value.
(-1 vs the last bytenr + 1)
Although it doesn't affect quota accounting, it's still better to keep
the original behavior.
Reported-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: ff3d27a048d9 ("btrfs: qgroup: Finish rescan when hit the last leaf of extent tree")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
index 473ad5985aa3..47dec283628d 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
@@ -2603,8 +2603,10 @@ qgroup_rescan_leaf(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct btrfs_path *path,
}
btrfs_put_tree_mod_seq(fs_info, &tree_mod_seq_elem);
- if (done && !ret)
+ if (done && !ret) {
ret = 1;
+ fs_info->qgroup_rescan_progress.objectid = (u64)-1;
+ }
return ret;
}
--
2.17.1
