On 10/17/18 7:07 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 03:14:04AM +0000, kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> From: Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> In kvp_send_key(), we do need call process_ib_ipinfo() if >> message->kvp_hdr.operation is KVP_OP_GET_IP_INFO, because it turns out >> the userland hv_kvp_daemon needs the info of operation, adapter_id and >> addr_family. With the incorrect fc62c3b1977d, the host can't get the >> VM's IP via KVP. >> >> And, fc62c3b1977d added a "break;", but actually forgot to initialize >> the key_size/value in the case of KVP_OP_SET, so the default key_size of >> 0 is passed to the kvp daemon, and the pool files >> /var/lib/hyperv/.kvp_pool_* can't be updated. >> >> This patch effectively rolls back the previous fc62c3b1977d, and >> correctly fixes the "this statement may fall through" warnings. >> >> This patch is tested on WS 2012 R2 and 2016. >> >> Fixes: fc62c3b1977d ("Drivers: hv: kvp: Fix two "this statement may fall through" warnings") >> Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: <Stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/hv/hv_kvp.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++---- >> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv_kvp.c b/drivers/hv/hv_kvp.c >> index a7513a8a8e37..9fbb15c62c6c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/hv/hv_kvp.c >> +++ b/drivers/hv/hv_kvp.c >> @@ -353,6 +353,9 @@ static void process_ib_ipinfo(void *in_msg, void *out_msg, int op) >> >> out->body.kvp_ip_val.dhcp_enabled = in->kvp_ip_val.dhcp_enabled; >> >> + __attribute__ ((fallthrough)); > > The comment should be sufficient for this, right? I haven't seen many > uses of this attribute before, how common is it? > It's not common at all. Dexuan, please use a comment instead: /* fall through */ Thanks -- Gustavo > >> + >> + case KVP_OP_GET_IP_INFO: >> utf16s_to_utf8s((wchar_t *)in->kvp_ip_val.adapter_id, >> MAX_ADAPTER_ID_SIZE, >> UTF16_LITTLE_ENDIAN, >> @@ -405,7 +408,11 @@ kvp_send_key(struct work_struct *dummy) >> process_ib_ipinfo(in_msg, message, KVP_OP_SET_IP_INFO); >> break; >> case KVP_OP_GET_IP_INFO: >> - /* We only need to pass on message->kvp_hdr.operation. */ >> + /* >> + * We only need to pass on the info of operation, adapter_id >> + * and addr_family to the userland kvp daemon. >> + */ >> + process_ib_ipinfo(in_msg, message, KVP_OP_GET_IP_INFO); >> break; >> case KVP_OP_SET: >> switch (in_msg->body.kvp_set.data.value_type) { >> @@ -446,9 +453,9 @@ kvp_send_key(struct work_struct *dummy) >> >> } >> >> - break; >> - >> - case KVP_OP_GET: >> + /* >> + * The key is always a string - utf16 encoding. >> + */ >> message->body.kvp_set.data.key_size = >> utf16s_to_utf8s( >> (wchar_t *)in_msg->body.kvp_set.data.key, >> @@ -456,6 +463,17 @@ kvp_send_key(struct work_struct *dummy) >> UTF16_LITTLE_ENDIAN, >> message->body.kvp_set.data.key, >> HV_KVP_EXCHANGE_MAX_KEY_SIZE - 1) + 1; >> + >> + break; >> + >> + case KVP_OP_GET: >> + message->body.kvp_get.data.key_size = >> + utf16s_to_utf8s( >> + (wchar_t *)in_msg->body.kvp_get.data.key, >> + in_msg->body.kvp_get.data.key_size, >> + UTF16_LITTLE_ENDIAN, >> + message->body.kvp_get.data.key, >> + HV_KVP_EXCHANGE_MAX_KEY_SIZE - 1) + 1; > > Worst indentation ever :( > > Yeah, I know it follows the others above it, but you should reconsider > it in the future... > > thanks, > > greg k-h >