4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 6b359d5550a1ae7a1269c9dc1dd73dfdc4d6fe58 ]
When modifying hairpin SQ, instead of checking if the next state equals
to MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY, we compare it against the MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY enum
value.
The code worked since both of MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY and MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY
have the same value today.
This patch fixes this issue.
Fixes: 18e568c390c6 ("net/mlx5: Hairpin pair core object setup")
Change-Id: I6758aa7b4bd137966ae28206b70648c5bc223b46
Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/transobj.c
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int mlx5_hairpin_modify_sq(struct
sqc = MLX5_ADDR_OF(modify_sq_in, in, ctx);
- if (next_state == MLX5_RQC_STATE_RDY) {
+ if (next_state == MLX5_SQC_STATE_RDY) {
MLX5_SET(sqc, sqc, hairpin_peer_rq, peer_rq);
MLX5_SET(sqc, sqc, hairpin_peer_vhca, peer_vhca);
}
