3.16.60-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> commit 12ecbb4b1d765a5076920999298d9625439dbe58 upstream. Commit e4502c63f56aeca88 (ufs: deal with nfsd/iget races) introduced unlock_new_inode() call into ufs_add_nondir(). However that function gets called also from ufs_link() which hands it already initialized inode and thus unlock_new_inode() complains. The problem is harmless but annoying. Fix the problem by opencoding necessary stuff in ufs_link() Fixes: e4502c63f56aeca887ced37f24e0def1ef11cec8 Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/ufs/namei.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/ufs/namei.c +++ b/fs/ufs/namei.c @@ -174,7 +174,12 @@ static int ufs_link (struct dentry * old inode_inc_link_count(inode); ihold(inode); - error = ufs_add_nondir(dentry, inode); + error = ufs_add_link(dentry, inode); + if (error) { + inode_dec_link_count(inode); + iput(inode); + } else + d_instantiate(dentry, inode); unlock_ufs(dir->i_sb); return error; }