On 10/10/2018 04:18 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 21:15:04 -0700 > Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> >>> Strange, I do not see "ip: use rb trees for IP frag queue." in this list ? >> >> And it was not in Stephen's backport to 4.14 either, wait, looks like it >> was somehow squashed into "net: sk_buff rbnode reorg". Stephen, was >> there a reason for that? >> >> Let me go back and add bffa72cf7f9df842f0016ba03586039296b4caaf as well >> as eeea10b83a139451130df1594f26710c8fa390c8 to the rebase todo and see >> how things go from there. >> >> Thanks for taking a look. > > I don't remember, spent time doing cherry-pick and fixups. Maybe the reorg > commit got squashed as part of one rebase. > No worries, I ended dropping these two commits because they would have required cherry-picking "udp: copy skb->truesize in the first cache line" which did not seem appropriate. I would appreciate if you could take a look at v2 and confirm this does look good, in particular the struct sk_buff layout. Thanks! -- Florian
