On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 03:26:37PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > On 09/27/18 14:37, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 12:43:33PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > > > On 09/27/18 11:03, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > 4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > > > > > ------------------ > > > > > > > > From: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > commit 3c499ea0c662e2f38aafbd4f516b08aab8cfa0e5 upstream. > > > > > > > > As pointed out by Daniel Vetter, we should be usinng > > > > drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset() for determining whether or not we want to > > > > make the debugfs nodes for atomic instead of checking DRIVER_ATOMIC, as > > > > the former isn't an accurate representation of whether or not the driver > > > > is actually using atomic modesetting internally (even though it might > > > > not be exposing atomic capabilities). > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180917173733.21293-1-lyude@xxxxxxxxxx > > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > This patch breaks switching the console to high resolution during boot on my > > > workstation with a Radeon card; it worked fine with 4.18.10 and reverting it > > > fixes the problem: > > > > Is 4.19-rc5 also a problem? > > > > No, 4.19-rc5 with the same config works fine and properly switches the > console during boot. > > Interestingly another machine with i915 chip seemed to work fine with this > patch included (rebooted that one first), so it might well be related to > different motherboard/chipset or the Radeon card (an admittedly old, but > otherwise completely functional fanless r600). > > I'll try to find more clues, but for now that's all I got. Ok, I'll go delete this, but this implies a much deeper problem with the code here. No logic should ever change based on a debugfs file creation failing or succeeding. The error checks here are all not needed at all. I'll work on a patch to clean it up for future kernels... thanks, greg k-h