Le 27/09/2018 à 13:09, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx> writes:
Le 26/09/2018 à 13:11, Daniel Thompson a écrit :
On 16/09/2018 20:06, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:35:44PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
On a powerpc 8xx, 'btc' fails as follows:
Entering kdb (current=0x(ptrval), pid 282) due to Keyboard Entry
...
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.15+
Would a Fixes: be better here?
Fixes: ad67b74d2469d9b82 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")
Christophe, When you add the Fixes: could you also add my
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Ok, thanks for the review, but do I have to do anything really ?
The Fixes: and now your Reviewed-by: appear automatically in patchwork
(https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=65715),
so I believe they'll be automatically included when Jason or someone
else takes the patch, no ?
patchwork won't add the Fixes tag from the reply, it needs to be in the
original mail.
See:
https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/151
Ok, so it accounts it and adds a '1' in the F column in the patches
list, but won't take it into account.
Then I'll send a v2 with revised commit text.
Christophe
