On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 05:40:54PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 9:18 AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:10:25AM -0700, Zubin Mithra wrote: > > > From: Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > commit 0633da48f0793aeba27f82d30605624416723a91 upstream. > > > > > > autofs_sbi() does not check the superblock magic number to verify it has > > > been given an autofs super block. > > > > > > Backport Note: autofs4 has been renamed to autofs upstream. As a result > > > the upstream patch does not apply cleanly onto 4.14.y. > > > > What about other kernel trees, this should also go into 4.18.y, right? > > Upstream commit 0633da48f0793aeba27f82d30605624416723a91 applies > directly to 4.18.y. Ah, makes sense, now queued up for 4.14.y and 4.18.y, thanks. > > Anything older than 4.14.y? > > > > It does apply to v4.4.y and v4.9,y, but it has minor include file > conflicts (different for each release). Thanks, that was easy to fix up. greg k-h
