From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 5b7b15aee641904ae269be9846610a3950cbd64c ] We're encoding a single op in the reply but leaving the number of ops zero, so the reply makes no sense. Somewhat academic as this isn't a case any real client will hit, though in theory perhaps that could change in a future protocol extension. Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c index eef0caf6e67d..e9495516527d 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c @@ -1725,6 +1725,7 @@ nfsd4_proc_compound(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, if (status) { op = &args->ops[0]; op->status = status; + resp->opcnt = 1; goto encode_op; } -- 2.17.1