4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 834539e69a5fe2aab33cc777ccfd4a4fcc5b9770 ]
After changing rhashtable_walk_start to return void, start_fail would
never be set other value than 0, and the checking for start_fail is
pointless, so remove it.
Fixes: 97a6ec4ac021 ("rhashtable: Change rhashtable_walk_start to return void")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/sctp/proc.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
--- a/net/sctp/proc.c
+++ b/net/sctp/proc.c
@@ -215,7 +215,6 @@ static const struct seq_operations sctp_
struct sctp_ht_iter {
struct seq_net_private p;
struct rhashtable_iter hti;
- int start_fail;
};
static void *sctp_transport_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
@@ -224,7 +223,6 @@ static void *sctp_transport_seq_start(st
sctp_transport_walk_start(&iter->hti);
- iter->start_fail = 0;
return sctp_transport_get_idx(seq_file_net(seq), &iter->hti, *pos);
}
@@ -232,8 +230,6 @@ static void sctp_transport_seq_stop(stru
{
struct sctp_ht_iter *iter = seq->private;
- if (iter->start_fail)
- return;
sctp_transport_walk_stop(&iter->hti);
}
