On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:33 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 05:23:28AM -0400, Chas Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 5:18 AM Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 11:05:15AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 04:58:52AM -0400, Chas Williams wrote:
> > > > > From: Chas Williams <chas3@xxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > Commit 3c226c637b69 ("mm: numa: avoid waiting on freed migrated pages")
> > > > > was an incomplete backport of the upstream commit. It is necessary to
> > > > > always reset page_nid before attempting any early exit.
> > > > > ---
> > > > > mm/huge_memory.c | 2 +-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > <formletter>
> > > >
> > > > This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
> > > > stable kernel tree. Please read:
> > > >
> > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
> > > > for how to do this properly.
> > > >
> > > > </formletter>
> > >
> > > This is an issue with the 4.9 tree, not mainline. The hash is
> > > incorrect but the problem appears valid.
> > >
> >
> > Unfortunately, this issue doesn't fit into option 1, 2 or 3. I could
> > only do option 4.
>
> Ok, but if so, you need to at least sign-off on your patch, right? :)
I can. I wasn't clear to me since I am just fixing what the
original author wrote.
>
>
> Also, call it out explicitly what you are trying to do here, and why the
> patch is not upstream, so I know what is going on.
How would you like this done? I thought the body of the
commit message was fairly clear (with the exception of the
hash).
>
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
