4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@xxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit 5cf3006cc81d9aa09a10aa781fc065546b12919d ] I was looking at usually suppressed gcc warnings, [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] in this case: The code definitely looks like a break is missing here. However I am not able to test the NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT, nor do I actually know what might be :) So please use this patch with caution and only if you are able to do some testing. Signed-off-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@xxxxxxxxxx> [johannes: looks obvious enough to apply as is, interesting though that it never seems to have been a problem] Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/wireless/nl80211.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c +++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c @@ -4058,6 +4058,7 @@ static int parse_station_flags(struct ge params->sta_flags_mask = BIT(NL80211_STA_FLAG_AUTHENTICATED) | BIT(NL80211_STA_FLAG_MFP) | BIT(NL80211_STA_FLAG_AUTHORIZED); + break; default: return -EINVAL; }
