It was initially a single patch that Oleg sent me a few weeks ago. Thinking
about it I think it may need a stable backport even though it doesn't look
very dangerous, but just in case.
So I've splitted the patch in 4 different parts because it may need
backporting on different tree version for each arch concerned.
Of course we need to consolidate that range check somewhere but after the
stable backport.
Comments.
Thanks,
Frederic
---
Oleg Nesterov (4):
arm: Fix the hw_breakpoint range check
x86: Fix the hw_breakpoint range check
arm64: Fix the hw_breakpoint range check
sh: Fix hw_breakpoint the range check
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 2 +-
arch/sh/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html