On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 01:31:05PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > map.m_lblk = first_block; > > - map.m_len = last_block - first_block + 1; > > + len = last_block - first_block + 1; > > + map.m_len = (len < UINT_MAX) ? len : UINT_MAX; > > Wouldn't "(len < UINT_MAX)" always be true on a 32-bit system, or is there some > other limitation in that case (e.g. filesystem < 16TB) that prevents it from > being an issue? Otherwise, this should use "unsigned long long len". first_block and last_block are both 32-bit values and defined as unsigned long. That's because they are logical block numbers and should never be more than 2**32. The fact that last_block had overflowed was due to i_size being corrupted to being an insanely large number. So it's fine that len is an unsigned long, since first_block and last_block are both unsigned long. - Ted
