On Tue, 2013-11-19 at 09:38 +0800, Fan Du wrote: > [cc Greg KH and ZeFan] > > On 2013年11月18日 14:25, Zhao Hongjiang wrote: > > Hi, Fan or Andrew, > > > > 74e3d1e17b2e11d175970b85acd44f5927000ba2 > > include/linux/fs.h: disable preempt when acquire i_size_seqcount write lock > > > > > > This looks applicable to stable-3.4, that fix a lockup while two rt tasks > > bind to one CPU core. It was built successful for me. What do you think? > > Quote from ZeFan: > ****************************************************************************** > The patch author can add a stable tag in the changelog if he feels the patch > should be backported to stable kernels. If he didn't do that, the maintainer > may tag it for stable. After the patch hits mainline, it will be queued into > stable queue automatically. > > If neither of them did that, and then someone else feels the fix is a stable > thing, this person can ask Greg to include it for stable, as long as no one > objects to it. > > What you need to do here, is ack or nack the stable request from Hongjiang. > ****************************************************************************** > > So here I give my acknowledgment to this request as the author of this patch. It looks like this is applicable to 3.2 as well, so I've added it to my queue. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part