From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
When I submitted the first patch adding these force wake functions,
Chris Wilson observed that I was using the wrong functions, so I sent
a second version of the patch to correct this problem. The problem is
that v1 was merged instead of v2.
I was able to notice the problem when running the
debugfs-forcewake-user subtest of pm_pc8 from intel-gpu-tools.
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 5566de5..5ea32a8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -6578,7 +6578,7 @@ static void hsw_restore_lcpll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
/* Make sure we're not on PC8 state before disabling PC8, otherwise
* we'll hang the machine! */
- dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get(dev_priv);
+ gen6_gt_force_wake_get(dev_priv);
if (val & LCPLL_POWER_DOWN_ALLOW) {
val &= ~LCPLL_POWER_DOWN_ALLOW;
@@ -6612,7 +6612,7 @@ static void hsw_restore_lcpll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
DRM_ERROR("Switching back to LCPLL failed\n");
}
- dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_put(dev_priv);
+ gen6_gt_force_wake_put(dev_priv);
}
void hsw_enable_pc8_work(struct work_struct *__work)
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html