> -----Original Message----- > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 2018年8月30日 17:17 > To: Chuanhua Han <chuanhua.han@xxxxxxx> > Cc: broonie@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] spi: spi-mem: Adjust op len based on message/transfer > size limitations > > On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 09:13:03 +0000 > Chuanhua Han <chuanhua.han@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: 2018年8月30日 16:47 > > > To: Chuanhua Han <chuanhua.han@xxxxxxx> > > > Cc: broonie@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] spi: spi-mem: Adjust op len based on > > > message/transfer size limitations > > > > > > Hi Chuanhua, > > > > > > On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 16:43:24 +0800 > > > Chuanhua Han <chuanhua.han@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > We need that to adjust the len of the 2nd transfer (called data in > > > > spi-mem) if it's too long to fit in a SPI message or SPI transfer. > > > > > > You already sent this email a few days back. Please wait a bit > > > before sending it again. And when you do so and nothing changed in > > > the patch please use the [PATCH RESEND vX] prefix and explain why you > resend it. > > I have modified the patch for the comment you mentioned last time. Do > > you need any other modification？ > > Oops, sorry. Looks like the previous one was only sent to me, not the ML and > the SPI maintainer. It doesn't matter，thank you for your valuable advice！
