[PATCH 4.17 267/324] drm/nouveau/gem: off by one bugs in nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



4.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit 7f073d011f93e92d4d225526b9ab6b8b0bbd6613 ]

The bo array has req->nr_buffers elements so the > should be >= so we
don't read beyond the end of the array.

Fixes: a1606a9596e5 ("drm/nouveau: new gem pushbuf interface, bump to 0.0.16")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply(struct n
 		struct nouveau_bo *nvbo;
 		uint32_t data;
 
-		if (unlikely(r->bo_index > req->nr_buffers)) {
+		if (unlikely(r->bo_index >= req->nr_buffers)) {
 			NV_PRINTK(err, cli, "reloc bo index invalid\n");
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 			break;
@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ nouveau_gem_pushbuf_reloc_apply(struct n
 		if (b->presumed.valid)
 			continue;
 
-		if (unlikely(r->reloc_bo_index > req->nr_buffers)) {
+		if (unlikely(r->reloc_bo_index >= req->nr_buffers)) {
 			NV_PRINTK(err, cli, "reloc container bo index invalid\n");
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 			break;





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux