Re: Nomination of amdgpu fixes for stable backport

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2018-08-16 05:54 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 05:36:16PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 2018-08-16 05:20 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 09:53:54AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi stable kernel maintainers,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> please squash these amdgpu fixes together and backport them to all
>>>> applicable stable branches:
>>>
>>> Nothing gets squashed, we apply individual patches :)
>>
>> That's a bit unfortunate in this case, as there can be spurious WARN
>> splats with only the first fix.
> 
> That's fine, no one is going to only apply one of them.
> 
>>>> 15e6b76880e65be24250e30986084b5569b7a06f "drm/amdgpu: Warn and update
>>>>                                           pin_size values when
>>>>                                           destroying a pinned BO"
>>>> 456607d816d89a442a3d5ec98b02c8bc950b5228 "drm/amdgpu: Don't warn on
>>>>                                           destroying a pinned BO"
>>>>
>>>> (These depend on commits a5ccfe5c20740f2fbf00291490cdf8d2373ec255 and
>>>> ddc21af4d0f37f42b33c54cb69b215997fe5b082, which already have Cc: stable)
>>>
>>> What stable tree(s) do you want these applied to?
>>
>> All active trees where they apply (and so do the patches they depend on).
> 
> A hint might be nice here, what trees did you test this on?

I didn't test it on any stable trees, but if the patches apply on a
branch, it means they're needed. :)


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux