On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 09:08:08PM +0200, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: > > Am 15.08.2018 um 20:55 schrieb Guenter Roeck: > >On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 08:27:00PM +0200, Sebastian Gottschall wrote: > >>if i fix the other error (can be reproduced with disable smp on standard > >>i386 build) > >> > >>another raises up again related to smp. to be serious. this patchset of x86 > >>patches is absolutelly broken and put together without any care. not a > >>simple compile test has been done > >> > >>sorry for beeing a little bit upset. i'm sure i will find other bugs if i go > >>deeper > >> > >It might possibly help if you would consider to publish your configuration(s). > > > >As for "not a simple compile test has been done", please have a look > >at http://kerneltests.org/builders. I guess those compile (and boot) > >tests don't count as "simple". I assume the same applies to all the > >builds done by 0day and all the other test builders. > > > >Guenter > > it was nothing special. just a standard x86 build with smp disabled. that > triggers all of them. so this should be a common build configuration for > testing > these issues are covered by the rc3 patch of 4.9 right now > > the issue reported by sven can be triggered by just compiling rtc-cmos.c > which is caused by the change in dmi.h (asm/io.h was replaced by > linux/io.h) > so this driver should be included in all x86 and x64 builds and must be > uncovered in any simple compile test > > btw. this issue is still unresolved but simple to fix > > --- arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h (revision 36620) > +++ arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h (working copy) > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ > #define _ASM_X86_I8259_H > > #include <linux/delay.h> > +#include <asm/io.h> > Also seen in mainline. Meaning my non-SMP test builds are broken. Hmm. Anyway, care to send a proper patch ? I am sure Linus will be more than happy to apply it. Thanks, Guenter
