On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 12:13:53PM -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. It was found the
> following patch introduced the regression:
>
> da9970668948 ("usb: xhci: Add XHCI_TRUST_TX_LENGTH for Renesas uPD720201")
I can see nothing in http://pad.lv/1773704 that indicates a regression
in this patch. How could there be? The patch does not not alter the
behaviour of uPD720202 devices (pdev->device == 0x0015).
> The bug reporter claims there is a typo in the patch that caused the
> regression. I built a test kernel with a change to the suspected typo
> and the bug reporter claims it resolved the regression. My test kernel
> had the following change:
>
> - pdev->device == 0x0014)
> + pdev->device == 0x0015)
>
> I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author. Do
> you think this is an actual typo, or maybe there really needs to be two
> quirks?
No, it is a not a typo (and the change above *does* introduce a regression
;-) ). From this git logs I believe that:
0x0014 -> uPD720201
0x0015 -> uPD720202
Daniel.
