From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> When I submitted the first patch adding these force wake functions, Chris Wilson observed that I was using the wrong functions, so I sent a second version of the patch to correct this problem. The problem is that v1 was merged instead of v2. I was able to notice the problem when running the debugfs-forcewake-user subtest of pm_pc8 from intel-gpu-tools. Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) See here: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2013-August/031934.html http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2013-August/031943.html http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2013-August/031950.html diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 3b7f1c4..d13f349 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -6578,7 +6578,7 @@ static void hsw_restore_lcpll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) /* Make sure we're not on PC8 state before disabling PC8, otherwise * we'll hang the machine! */ - dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_get(dev_priv); + gen6_gt_force_wake_get(dev_priv); if (val & LCPLL_POWER_DOWN_ALLOW) { val &= ~LCPLL_POWER_DOWN_ALLOW; @@ -6612,7 +6612,7 @@ static void hsw_restore_lcpll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) DRM_ERROR("Switching back to LCPLL failed\n"); } - dev_priv->uncore.funcs.force_wake_put(dev_priv); + gen6_gt_force_wake_put(dev_priv); } void hsw_enable_pc8_work(struct work_struct *__work) -- 1.8.3.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html