4.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 4dc93fcf0b95dc3fda4db917effae31fbb8ad2a8 ]
On the RAH registers there are semantic differences on the meaning of
the "queue" parameter for traffic steering depending on the controller
model: there is the 82575 meaning, which "queue" means a RX Hardware
Queue, and the i350 meaning, where it is a reception pool.
The previous behaviour was having no effect for i210 based controllers
because the QSEL bit of the RAH register wasn't being set.
This patch separates the condition in discrete cases, so the different
handling is clearer.
Fixes: 83c21335c876 ("igb: improve MAC filter handling")
Signed-off-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@xxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
@@ -8763,12 +8763,17 @@ static void igb_rar_set_index(struct igb
if (is_valid_ether_addr(addr))
rar_high |= E1000_RAH_AV;
- if (hw->mac.type == e1000_82575)
+ switch (hw->mac.type) {
+ case e1000_82575:
+ case e1000_i210:
rar_high |= E1000_RAH_POOL_1 *
adapter->mac_table[index].queue;
- else
+ break;
+ default:
rar_high |= E1000_RAH_POOL_1 <<
adapter->mac_table[index].queue;
+ break;
+ }
}
wr32(E1000_RAL(index), rar_low);
