4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Kai Chieh Chuang <kaichieh.chuang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 9c0ac70ad24d76b873c1551e27790c7f6a815d5c ]
In case, one BE is used by two FE1/FE2
FE1--->BE-->
|
FE2----]
when FE1/FE2 call dpcm_be_dai_hw_free() together
the BE users will be 2 (> 1), hence cannot be hw_free
the be state will leave at, ex. SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_STOP
later FE1/FE2 call dpcm_be_dai_shutdown(),
will be skip due to wrong state.
leaving the BE not being hw_free and shutdown.
The BE dai will be hw_free later when calling
dpcm_be_dai_shutdown() if still in invalid state.
Signed-off-by: KaiChieh Chuang <kaichieh.chuang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
@@ -1793,8 +1793,10 @@ int dpcm_be_dai_shutdown(struct snd_soc_
continue;
if ((be->dpcm[stream].state != SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_HW_FREE) &&
- (be->dpcm[stream].state != SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_OPEN))
- continue;
+ (be->dpcm[stream].state != SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_OPEN)) {
+ soc_pcm_hw_free(be_substream);
+ be->dpcm[stream].state = SND_SOC_DPCM_STATE_HW_FREE;
+ }
dev_dbg(be->dev, "ASoC: close BE %s\n",
be->dai_link->name);
