On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 10:10:52PM +0530, Rashika Kheria wrote: > On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 09:42:32PM +0530, Rashika Kheria wrote: > >> This patch fixes the bug in reset_store caused by accessing NULL pointer. > >> > >> The bdev gets its value from bdget_disk() which could fail when memory > >> pressure is severe and hence can return NULL because allocation of > >> inode in bdget could fail. > >> > >> Hence, this patch introduces a check for bdev to prevent reference to a > >> NULL pointer in the later part of the code. It also removes unnecessary > >> check of bdev for fsync_bdev(). > >> > >> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Acked-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 6 ++++-- > >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > I'm still confused, what happened to patch 2/2? > > > > Can you just send me the patches, in an ordered series, of _all_ of the > > outstanding zram patches. That way I know I got them all, as it is, I'm > > still not sure as it seems that I am missing some, and the v10 patch is > > not in any specific order. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > Sorry for the confusion. But, you just have to apply v10 of this > series. The rest of the patches have already been applied. Then why did you sent the v9 1/2 patch? still confused... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html