Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915: No LVDS hardware on Intel D410PT and D425KT" failed to apply to 3.10-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I've not looked at 3.10 but when I first played with this on 3.9 the
D510MO (which is the line patch ends up using as the location anchor)
wasn't in the list, so I'd guess that's why it fails on 3.10-stable. If
so, I wonder whether it's appropriate to backport this but not the
addition of the D510MO?

Cheers,
Rob


On 09/11/13 06:24, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> The patch below does not apply to the 3.10-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> 
>>From 645378d85ee524e429aa4cf52806047b56cdc596 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Rob Pearce <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 16:13:42 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: No LVDS hardware on Intel D410PT and D425KT
> 
> The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
> having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
> the list of such systems. Patch is against 3.11.4
> 
> v2: Patch revised to match the D425KT exactly as the D425KTW does have
> LVDS.  According to Intel's documentation, the D410PTL and D410PLTW
> don't.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rob Pearce <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [danvet: Pimp commit message to my liking and add cc: stable.]
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> index 831a5c021c4b..b8af94a5be39 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> @@ -700,6 +700,22 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id intel_no_lvds[] = {
>  	},
>  	{
>  		.callback = intel_no_lvds_dmi_callback,
> +		.ident = "Intel D410PT",
> +		.matches = {
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "Intel"),
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "D410PT"),
> +		},
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.callback = intel_no_lvds_dmi_callback,
> +		.ident = "Intel D425KT",
> +		.matches = {
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "Intel"),
> +			DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "D425KT"),
> +		},
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.callback = intel_no_lvds_dmi_callback,
>  		.ident = "Intel D510MO",
>  		.matches = {
>  			DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "Intel"),
> 
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]