4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> commit ebec3f8f5271139df618ebdf8427e24ba102ba94 upstream. syzbot is reporting stalls at __process_echoes() [1]. This is because since ldata->echo_commit < ldata->echo_tail becomes true for some reason, the discard loop is serving as almost infinite loop. This patch tries to avoid falling into ldata->echo_commit < ldata->echo_tail situation by making access to echo_* variables more carefully. Since reset_buffer_flags() is called without output_lock held, it should not touch echo_* variables. And omit a call to reset_buffer_flags() from n_tty_open() by using vzalloc(). Since add_echo_byte() is called without output_lock held, it needs memory barrier between storing into echo_buf[] and incrementing echo_head counter. echo_buf() needs corresponding memory barrier before reading echo_buf[]. Lack of handling the possibility of not-yet-stored multi-byte operation might be the reason of falling into ldata->echo_commit < ldata->echo_tail situation, for if I do WARN_ON(ldata->echo_commit == tail + 1) prior to echo_buf(ldata, tail + 1), the WARN_ON() fires. Also, explicitly masking with buffer for the former "while" loop, and use ldata->echo_commit > tail for the latter "while" loop. [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=17f23b094cd80df750e5b0f8982c521ee6bcbf40 Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+108696293d7a21ab688f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/tty/n_tty.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/tty/n_tty.c +++ b/drivers/tty/n_tty.c @@ -145,6 +145,7 @@ static inline unsigned char *read_buf_ad static inline unsigned char echo_buf(struct n_tty_data *ldata, size_t i) { + smp_rmb(); /* Matches smp_wmb() in add_echo_byte(). */ return ldata->echo_buf[i & (N_TTY_BUF_SIZE - 1)]; } @@ -320,9 +321,7 @@ static inline void put_tty_queue(unsigne static void reset_buffer_flags(struct n_tty_data *ldata) { ldata->read_head = ldata->canon_head = ldata->read_tail = 0; - ldata->echo_head = ldata->echo_tail = ldata->echo_commit = 0; ldata->commit_head = 0; - ldata->echo_mark = 0; ldata->line_start = 0; ldata->erasing = 0; @@ -621,13 +620,20 @@ static size_t __process_echoes(struct tt old_space = space = tty_write_room(tty); tail = ldata->echo_tail; - while (ldata->echo_commit != tail) { + while (MASK(ldata->echo_commit) != MASK(tail)) { c = echo_buf(ldata, tail); if (c == ECHO_OP_START) { unsigned char op; int no_space_left = 0; /* + * Since add_echo_byte() is called without holding + * output_lock, we might see only portion of multi-byte + * operation. + */ + if (MASK(ldata->echo_commit) == MASK(tail + 1)) + goto not_yet_stored; + /* * If the buffer byte is the start of a multi-byte * operation, get the next byte, which is either the * op code or a control character value. @@ -638,6 +644,8 @@ static size_t __process_echoes(struct tt unsigned int num_chars, num_bs; case ECHO_OP_ERASE_TAB: + if (MASK(ldata->echo_commit) == MASK(tail + 2)) + goto not_yet_stored; num_chars = echo_buf(ldata, tail + 2); /* @@ -732,7 +740,8 @@ static size_t __process_echoes(struct tt /* If the echo buffer is nearly full (so that the possibility exists * of echo overrun before the next commit), then discard enough * data at the tail to prevent a subsequent overrun */ - while (ldata->echo_commit - tail >= ECHO_DISCARD_WATERMARK) { + while (ldata->echo_commit > tail && + ldata->echo_commit - tail >= ECHO_DISCARD_WATERMARK) { if (echo_buf(ldata, tail) == ECHO_OP_START) { if (echo_buf(ldata, tail + 1) == ECHO_OP_ERASE_TAB) tail += 3; @@ -742,6 +751,7 @@ static size_t __process_echoes(struct tt tail++; } + not_yet_stored: ldata->echo_tail = tail; return old_space - space; } @@ -752,6 +762,7 @@ static void commit_echoes(struct tty_str size_t nr, old, echoed; size_t head; + mutex_lock(&ldata->output_lock); head = ldata->echo_head; ldata->echo_mark = head; old = ldata->echo_commit - ldata->echo_tail; @@ -760,10 +771,12 @@ static void commit_echoes(struct tty_str * is over the threshold (and try again each time another * block is accumulated) */ nr = head - ldata->echo_tail; - if (nr < ECHO_COMMIT_WATERMARK || (nr % ECHO_BLOCK > old % ECHO_BLOCK)) + if (nr < ECHO_COMMIT_WATERMARK || + (nr % ECHO_BLOCK > old % ECHO_BLOCK)) { + mutex_unlock(&ldata->output_lock); return; + } - mutex_lock(&ldata->output_lock); ldata->echo_commit = head; echoed = __process_echoes(tty); mutex_unlock(&ldata->output_lock); @@ -814,7 +827,9 @@ static void flush_echoes(struct tty_stru static inline void add_echo_byte(unsigned char c, struct n_tty_data *ldata) { - *echo_buf_addr(ldata, ldata->echo_head++) = c; + *echo_buf_addr(ldata, ldata->echo_head) = c; + smp_wmb(); /* Matches smp_rmb() in echo_buf(). */ + ldata->echo_head++; } /** @@ -1883,30 +1898,21 @@ static int n_tty_open(struct tty_struct struct n_tty_data *ldata; /* Currently a malloc failure here can panic */ - ldata = vmalloc(sizeof(*ldata)); + ldata = vzalloc(sizeof(*ldata)); if (!ldata) - goto err; + return -ENOMEM; ldata->overrun_time = jiffies; mutex_init(&ldata->atomic_read_lock); mutex_init(&ldata->output_lock); tty->disc_data = ldata; - reset_buffer_flags(tty->disc_data); - ldata->column = 0; - ldata->canon_column = 0; - ldata->num_overrun = 0; - ldata->no_room = 0; - ldata->lnext = 0; tty->closing = 0; /* indicate buffer work may resume */ clear_bit(TTY_LDISC_HALTED, &tty->flags); n_tty_set_termios(tty, NULL); tty_unthrottle(tty); - return 0; -err: - return -ENOMEM; } static inline int input_available_p(struct tty_struct *tty, int poll)
