4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit f0dfd7a2b35b02030949100247d851b793cb275f upstream.
Currently the -EBUSY error return path is not free'ing resources
allocated earlier, leaving a memory leak. Fix this by exiting via the
error exit label err5 that performs the necessary resource clean
up.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1432975 ("Resource leak")
Fixes: 9744a6fcefcb ("netfilter: nf_tables: check if same extensions are set when adding elements")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -3999,8 +3999,10 @@ static int nft_add_set_elem(struct nft_c
if (nft_set_ext_exists(ext, NFT_SET_EXT_DATA) ^
nft_set_ext_exists(ext2, NFT_SET_EXT_DATA) ||
nft_set_ext_exists(ext, NFT_SET_EXT_OBJREF) ^
- nft_set_ext_exists(ext2, NFT_SET_EXT_OBJREF))
- return -EBUSY;
+ nft_set_ext_exists(ext2, NFT_SET_EXT_OBJREF)) {
+ err = -EBUSY;
+ goto err5;
+ }
if ((nft_set_ext_exists(ext, NFT_SET_EXT_DATA) &&
nft_set_ext_exists(ext2, NFT_SET_EXT_DATA) &&
memcmp(nft_set_ext_data(ext),
