On (06/19/18 09:23), Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On (06/19/18 09:52), Petr Mladek wrote: > > > On Mon 2018-06-18 19:07:18, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > > > On (06/18/18 11:39), Petr Mladek wrote: > > > > [..] > > > > > > > > Hmm. Can't answer right now :) > > > > > > Please, let me know what name you would like ;-) > > > > :) Wow, it's hard. Maybe we can derive some bits from the ftrace_dump() > > function name? Dunno... Does printk_dump_nmi_enter() sound terrible? > > > > Maybe Steven has some opinions on this? > > > > What exactly is the question? Which one of these you'd prefer to see in ftrace_dump(): - printk_nmi_direct_enter() / printk_nmi_direct_exit() - printk_chatty_nmi_enter() / printk_chatty_nmi_exit() - printk_large_nmi_enter() / printk_large_nmi_exit() - printk_dump_nmi_enter() / printk_dump_nmi_exit() > Also, from a previous email in this thread, if you have to risk > interleaved output to solve a deadlock, then just do that. Yep. -ss
