3.16.57-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx> commit 3a61b527b4e1f285d21b6e9e623dc45cf8bb391f upstream. Check the variable that was most recently initialized. The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // <smpl> @@ expression x, y, f, g, e, m; statement S1,S2,S3,S4; @@ x = f(...); if (\(<+...x...+>\&e\)) S1 else S2 ( x = g(...); | m = g(...,&x,...); | y = g(...); *if (e) S3 else S4 ) // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_uvd.c @@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ int radeon_uvd_calc_upll_dividers(struct /* calc dclk divider with current vco freq */ dclk_div = radeon_uvd_calc_upll_post_div(vco_freq, dclk, pd_min, pd_even); - if (vclk_div > pd_max) + if (dclk_div > pd_max) break; /* vco is too big, it has to stop */ /* calc score with current vco freq */