Re: [patch 3/8] x86/apic: Provide apic_ack_irq()

[Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Thomas,

At 06/06/2018 04:04 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Dou Liyang wrote:
>
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > At 06/05/2018 07:41 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Tue, 5 Jun 2018, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +	if (unlikely(irqd_is_setaffinity_pending(irqd)))
> > > >
> > > > Affinity pending is also judged in
> > > >
> > > > > +		irq_move_irq(irqd);
> > > >
> > > > If we can remove the if(...) statement here
> > >
> > > That requires to fix all call sites in ia64 and that's why I didn't.  But
> >
> > I didn't express clearly, I meant remove the if(...) statement from
> > apic_ack_irq(), it doesn't require to fix the call sites in ia64.
>
> I put the check there on purpose as I explained in the changelog:
>
>     Making the invocation of irq_move_irq() conditional avoids the out of
>     line call if the pending bit is not set.

I completely understand now, thank you so much. :-)

Thanks,
	dou

> Thanks,
>
> 	tglx