4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit d6fbe1c55c55c6937cbea3531af7da84ab7473c3 upstream.
Add a definition for cpu_show_spectre_v2() to override the generic
version. This has several permuations, though in practice some may not
occur we cater for any combination.
The most verbose is:
Mitigation: Indirect branch serialisation (kernel only), Indirect
branch cache disabled, ori31 speculation barrier enabled
We don't treat the ori31 speculation barrier as a mitigation on its
own, because it has to be *used* by code in order to be a mitigation
and we don't know if userspace is doing that. So if that's all we see
we say:
Vulnerable, ori31 speculation barrier enabled
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/security.c
@@ -58,3 +58,36 @@ ssize_t cpu_show_spectre_v1(struct devic
return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable\n");
}
+
+ssize_t cpu_show_spectre_v2(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+ bool bcs, ccd, ori;
+ struct seq_buf s;
+
+ seq_buf_init(&s, buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1);
+
+ bcs = security_ftr_enabled(SEC_FTR_BCCTRL_SERIALISED);
+ ccd = security_ftr_enabled(SEC_FTR_COUNT_CACHE_DISABLED);
+ ori = security_ftr_enabled(SEC_FTR_SPEC_BAR_ORI31);
+
+ if (bcs || ccd) {
+ seq_buf_printf(&s, "Mitigation: ");
+
+ if (bcs)
+ seq_buf_printf(&s, "Indirect branch serialisation (kernel only)");
+
+ if (bcs && ccd)
+ seq_buf_printf(&s, ", ");
+
+ if (ccd)
+ seq_buf_printf(&s, "Indirect branch cache disabled");
+ } else
+ seq_buf_printf(&s, "Vulnerable");
+
+ if (ori)
+ seq_buf_printf(&s, ", ori31 speculation barrier enabled");
+
+ seq_buf_printf(&s, "\n");
+
+ return s.len;
+}
