Re: [patch 2/8] genirq/generic_pending: Do not lose pending affinity update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Thomas,

At 06/04/2018 11:33 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
The generic pending interrupt mechanism moves interrupts from the interrupt
handler on the original target CPU to the new destination CPU. This is
required for x86 and ia64 due to the way the interrupt delivery and
acknowledge works if the interrupts are not remapped.

However that update can fail for various reasons. Some of them are valid
reasons to discard the pending update, but the case, when the previous move
has not been fully cleaned up is not a legit reason to fail.

Check the return value of irq_do_set_affinity() for -EBUSY, which indicates
a pending cleanup, and rearm the pending move in the irq dexcriptor so it's

s/dexcriptor/descriptor

tried again when the next interrupt arrives.

Fixes: 996c591227d9 ("x86/irq: Plug vector cleanup race")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner<tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
  kernel/irq/migration.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++------
  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/irq/migration.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/migration.c
@@ -38,17 +38,18 @@ bool irq_fixup_move_pending(struct irq_d
  void irq_move_masked_irq(struct irq_data *idata)
  {
  	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_data_to_desc(idata);
-	struct irq_chip *chip = desc->irq_data.chip;
+	struct irq_data *data = &desc->irq_data;
+	struct irq_chip *chip = data->chip;
- if (likely(!irqd_is_setaffinity_pending(&desc->irq_data)))
+	if (likely(!irqd_is_setaffinity_pending(data)))
  		return;
- irqd_clr_move_pending(&desc->irq_data);
+	irqd_clr_move_pending(data);
/*
  	 * Paranoia: cpu-local interrupts shouldn't be calling in here anyway.
  	 */
-	if (irqd_is_per_cpu(&desc->irq_data)) {
+	if (irqd_is_per_cpu(data)) {
  		WARN_ON(1);
  		return;
  	}
@@ -73,9 +74,20 @@ void irq_move_masked_irq(struct irq_data
  	 * For correct operation this depends on the caller
  	 * masking the irqs.
  	 */
-	if (cpumask_any_and(desc->pending_mask, cpu_online_mask) < nr_cpu_ids)
-		irq_do_set_affinity(&desc->irq_data, desc->pending_mask, false);
+	if (cpumask_any_and(desc->pending_mask, cpu_online_mask) < nr_cpu_ids) {
+		int ret;
+ ret = irq_do_set_affinity(data, desc->pending_mask, false);
+		/*
+		 * If the there is a cleanup pending in the underlying

s/If the there is/If there is/

Thanks,
	dou





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux